RECENT COURT VICTORIES

On January 28, 2026, attorney Alford received a verdict of Not Guilty on Count 1: the Refusal to Submit to Testing after seperating the charges. This case was highly litigated after being retained. The defendant experienced poor representation at this prior firm and elected to hire us. Within a few weeks, a motion to suppress was filed and heard. The Refusal trial was then conducted and won, however the job was not done. Mr. Alford filed a motion to dismiss to the DUI based on winning the Refusal charge. Although that motion was denied, a motion in Limine was granted in part taking out some of the evidence from the prior trial. After being set for trial several times, the State elected to reduce the DUI to a reckless driving with no probation or jail as a resolution if the client completed Proof of Compliance on the Suspended License charge. This closed out the case with NO JAIL OR PROBATION for any of the charges. The client was very happy with the result and representation.

Our Client was charged under the new super speeder law with driving at 101 MPH in a 70 MPH zone.  Upon examining the speed measurement documents, we observed that the laser log did not comply with the requirements of law.  Shortly after we filed a motion in limine to exclude the speed measurement, the State voluntarily dropped the charge against our Client.  The State recognized that our defense of our Client was correct.

The Client was stopped for running a red light, and once stopped law enforcement believed she was impaired by alcohol.  The Client was asked to participate in field sobriety exercises and was said to have subsequently performed poorly pursuant to the Officer's report.  The Client's father had seen the Firm's lawyers in action as a juror in a trial earlier in the year and decided to advise the Client to hire the Firm.  Once retained, the Firm then investigated the case and found that the Client looked very sober and alert, according to the video evidence in the case.  The State was consulted on the case and eventually the DUI charges were dismissed.

The Client was alleged to have committed domestic battery on his girlfriend after arriving at her apartment and having an argument.  It was claimed by the Client  that he did not strike the girlfriend.  The Firm filed their Notice of Appearance on the case and the case was totally dismissed the next day.

Our client was accused of Battery on a Law Enforcement Officer, DUI, and Resisting an Officer Without Violence. When this client came to us, he explained what happened and we later received the videos in his case that confirmed his account. We discussed the case with the prosecutor who originally wanted the client to spend 60 days in jail. The prosecutor reasoned that the client was accused of kicking a police officer multiple times during the incident. We used the information supplied by the prosecutor to make legal and factual arguments as to why the case was not appropriate as charged and why the client acted in the manner he did. Not only was the felony charge dismissed, but the client served absolutely no additional jail time.

Our client was charged with Grand Theft.  The allegation was that while at an upscale Boca Raton restaurant, the Defendant stole a very expensive purse after another customer left the purse behind.  Video camera footage from the restaurant captured the event and the police began investigating and trying to make contact with the Defendant. The Defendant's job was in jeopardy as a result of these charges.  Professional licenses could have been lost with a conviction. Ticket Clinic lawyers spoke with the investigating detectives in an attempt to avoid charges being filed.  Ticket Clinic lawyers returned the purse to the detective and no contents were missing.  However, the victim insisted on a prosecution.  After Ticket Clinic lawyers filed on the case and began a dialogue, the State agreed to drop all charges.  Ticket Clinic's Expungement department is now working to expunge the file so that the Defendant's record remains clean.

The Client was charged with DUI after being stopped by law enforcement for speeding.  The Defendant admitted to drinking beers and shots of alcohol.  After a DUI investigation where the Defendant performed poorly on the field sobriety exercises, the Defendant was arrested.  At the jail the Defendant gave a breath sample that was found to be just barely over the legal limit.  The Defense argued that the breath sample was very close to not being over the legal limit and that a jury could find that the Defendant was not DUI as a result.  In addition, the Firm argued there was the possibility that law enforcement was also outside their jurisdiction in the matter when they requested the breath sample.  The State agreed with the combined arguments by the firm and dismissed the DUI.