The defendant was stopped for failing to obey a traffic control device. Once the officer\'s lights were activated, the defendant was slow to respond. Signs of impairment were noticed by the officer and a DUI Task Force officer was asked to respond. After performing roadside exercises poorly on video, the defendant was arrested, and blew .140. .139 on the breath test. DUI charge dropped by the State.
The defendant was stopped by police for speeding, and for failing to maintain her lane of travel. Upon making contact with the defendant Officers noted that she seemed impaired and had glassy reddened eyes, slow dexterity, and a slight odor of an alcoholic beverage about her breath. Officers also noted that the defendant appeared unstable while walking to an area for roadside tasks in that she was rocking back and fourth on her feet. The defendant admitting drinking vodka, and smoking marijuana 2-3 weeks earlier. The defendant performed poorly on roadside exercises and was arrested for DUI. The defendant submitted to a breath test which was .000. Officers then requested a urine sample which the Defendant refused. DUI charge dropped 7-13-07.
An officer observed the defendant run a stop sign at John Young Circle in Hollywood, FL. and then fail to maintain his lane, almost causing an accident with another vehicle. The defendant failed to pull over for two blocks. The officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, bloodshot, watery eyes and slurred speech. The defendant had difficulty exiting the vehicle and was unsteady on his feet. He was lethargic and used his vehicle for balance while walking. The defendant performed poorly on roadside sobriety exercises and blew a .247/.257 on the intoxylizer, over three times the legal limit. The judge did not allow the case to go to the jury and entered a directed verdict in favor of the defendant, the functional equivalent of a dismissal.
An officer observed the defendant run a stop sign at John Young Circle in Hollywood, FL. and then fail to maintain his lane, almost causing an accident with another vehicle. The defendant failed to pull over for two blocks. The officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, bloodshot, watery eyes and slurred speech. The defendant had difficulty exiting the vehicle and was unsteady on his feet. He was lethargic and used his vehicle for balance while walking. The defendant performed poorly on roadside sobriety exercises and blew a .247/.257 on the intoxylizer, over three times the legal limit. The judge did not allow the case to go to the jury and entered a directed verdict in favor of the defendant, the functional equivalent of a dismissal.
An officer from the Miccossukee Police Department witnessed the defendant speeding on a motorcycle. The officer put his lights on to effect a traffic stop, but the defendant sped off at speeds in excess of 150 M.P.H. The defendant ran out of gas and was arrested for Felony Fleeing and Eluding, a third degree felony. Our Firm filed a demand for Speedy trial and announced ready for trial. The State dropped all felony charges.
The defendant was charged with Criminal Mischief arising out of spray painting a pier in Lauderdale by the Sea. The firm filed a motion to suppress an unlawful seizure of the defendant. The motion was granted and the State dropped all charges.
The defendant was accused of the crime of Trespassing by several officers for failing to leave the Hard Rodk Hotel and Casino in Hollywood, Florida. The Judge directed a verdict in favor of the defendant as the Tresspass affidavit was legally insufficient. Case dismissed by judge during Trial.
The defendant was stopped by the police for going 56 mph in a 35 mph zone, weaving within her lane of travel and for following vehicles in front of her too closely. Police noticed that the defendant had bloodshot – glassy eyes, a strong odor of an alcoholic beverage, slurred speech and was very argumentative. The defendant admitted having a few drinks and performed poorly of field sobriety exercises. The defendant refused a breath test and was arrested for DUI. After a jury trial, The defendant was found not guilty of DUI after the jury deliberated for one minute.
The defendant was stopped for driving without headlights. The defendant took the breath test and blew .085 and .087. DUI charge dropped.
The defendant was seen by officers bumping into a curb and later weaving in and out of traffic. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, flushed complexion, slurred speech and an inability to maintain balance upon making contact with the defendant. The defendant performed poorly on roadsides and submitted to a breath test, which resulted in a .129/.141 g/210L, well over the legal limit. On the day of trial, the State dropped the D.U.I. charge.
The defendant crashed into three other vehicles while they were stopped at a traffic light. The defendant then left the scene of the accident. One of the vehicles followed the defendant until law enforcement arrived. Deputy Hauter and the BSO DUI Task Force noticed that the defendant had an odor of alcohol on his breath, observed glassy bloodshot eyes, was unsteady on his feet, had urinated in his pants and stated he had consumed two Corona Beers and felt that he was impaired by alcohol. The defendant performed poorly on the roadsides and took the breath test, which indicated he was a one point and was probably over the limit. The State dropped the D.U.I Charges.
The officer was on his way home from work when he saw the defendant next to another car at a traffic light. The officer testified that he saw the defendant and the other car \"peel out\", spin tires and take off at a high rate of speed for over a quarter of a mile. The defendant admitted to \"being stupid and playing around.\" Acquitted by jury within 10 minutes of beginning deliberations.
