Our client was arrested for DUI after being involved in a single car crash with a light pole. When police arrived, our client was in the back seat of the car, but another person on scene identified her as the driver of the car. While dazed, our client admitted to being the driver of the car. Ticket Clinic lawyers reviewed the evidence , using GPS tracking and blood splatter evidence from the steering wheel , convinced the State Attorney's Office, that the "witness" at the scene of the crash was the actual driver of the car and that he had lied to save himself. As a result of this work by Ticket Clinic lawyers, the State dropped all charges against our client.
Our client was charged with Resisting an officer without violence. He was driving 85 mph in a 55 mph zone. His radar detector alerted him to the deputy's radar gun. Our client suddenly braked to a stop, prior to reaching the location of the deputy. Our client got out of his car. The deputy told our client to return to his vehicle. Our client said that he ran out of gas. But he had just passed a gas station. Our client refused to return to his vehicle. The deputy asked him again to return to his vehicle. Our client again refused to return to his vehicle and told the cop to take him to jail. Our client was arrested and charged with resisting. After reading the attorney's arguments, the prosecutor dismissed the criminal charge against our client. Case dismissed.
Our client was charged with Possession of Cocaine, which stemmed from a traffic stop. After being retained, Ticket Clinic lawyers began investigating the case and began negotiations with the prosecuting attorney. Ultimately, our client was required to complete a 4 hour drug awareness course, but the State agreed to dismiss the criminal charge, keeping this charge off of our client's record and preventing any mandatory driver license suspension.
Our client, who was 19 years old, was charged criminally with Reckless Driving. Ticket Clinic attorneys researched the case thoroughly, and presented compelling case law to the prosecutor. We proved that the state would be unable to establish the criminal charge in court based on the facts of the case. The state agreed and dropped the criminal charge.
On the night before his 21st birthday, our client allegedly made an illegal left turn without yielding to oncoming traffic. Ticket Clinic lawyers reviewed the evidence against our client, investigated the case thoroughly and convinced the State Attorney to drop the DUI charge. Our client, who was young, preserved his driving record and avoided the DUI conviction.
Our client was charged with his second dui with children as passengers. Our client was stopped for weaving in his lane and crossing the double yellow line, with several near-miss accidents. Our client was pulled over and officers found marijuana in the car. There was marijuana shake our client. Our client admitted to smoking marijuana in the car as he drove. He had he three kids in the car, aged 9, 4, and 2. His urine tested positive for THC. A certified Drug Recognition Expert evaluated our client. He found that our client was impaired at the time of his driving. Motions to suppress were filed. The hearing was set. After reading the motions and the attorney's arguments, the prosecutor dismissed the charge against our client. Case dismissed.
Our client was charged with Felony DWLS, as an Habitual Traffic Offender, facing 5 years in Florida State prison. Ticket Clinic lawyers reviewed the evidence against him and convinced the State Attorney to drop the Felony charge. Ultimately, the client was not convicted of any crime and avoided prison.
The Client was charged with DUI after he allegedly rear ended another car in the drive thru at a local taco bell. The Police then arrived on scene and did a DUI investigation. After the Client performed poorly on the sobriety exercises he was subsequently arrested and charged with his second DUI within a period of five years. The State offered at least 60 days in jail and a five year license suspension, among other penalties, to resolve the case. The Firm investigated the case and discovered that there was no damage to the alleged victim’s car, which indicated there may not be an accident at all. Because of this fact the Firm and the State tried to jointly speak with the alleged victim, but were unable to locate the alleged victim. Because of this evidentiary problem the State agreed with the Firm’s assertion that the DUI should be dismissed, and subsequently dropped the DUI.
Client was charged with prostitution after an investigation into a website. Charges were brought directly by the State against her. From the outset, our office attempted to show the State that they couldn't prove the charge due to a lack of evidence. After a year of working the case, researching the issues, and conducting a deposition of the officer, our attorney finally proved to the State that they could not prove the charge, and the State dropped the case against our client.
Our client was charged with Racing on Highway. On a four lane highway, our client was stopped at a traffic signal. Beside our client in an adjacent lane, a vehicle revved its engine. When the light turned green, both rapidly accelerated. At the first court date, I argued that the elements of the crime could not be established beyond a reasonable doubt. The State offered an adjudication and court costs. I rejected the offer indicating that the State could not prove it. The State offered a withhold of adjudication and court costs. I rejected the offer on the basis that under Section 316.191(3)(a), Florida Statutes, the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles must revoke an offender’s driving privileges for a minimum period of one year upon conviction, EVEN IF ADJUDICATION IS WITHHELD. Not waiving speedy trial, the Judge set it for a trial, for the following month. After providing case law to the prosecutor regarding what must be proven on a charge of Racing on Highway, the case was dismissed.
The Client was involved in an accident and once police arrived on scene they noticed he seemed impaired. The Officers weren’t sure if he was under the influence of controlled substances or alcohol, but after doing a brief investigation they observed an odor of alcohol and the Client admitted to taking various controlled substances. Law enforcement got a urine same which then confirmed the controlled substances. The Firm was hired and began negotiating with the State Attorney’s Office which did not want to dismiss the DUI without suspending the Client’s license. The Firm pointed out that the Client was extremely cooperative and also had no prior criminal history and was only on the medication for strictly medical reasons, and an expert may be able to testify that the Client didn’t feel much of an impairment effect from said medications. The State eventually agreed and dismissed the DUI without requiring the Client’s license to be suspended.
The Client’s car was witnessed by law enforcement jumping a curb and then hitting a street sign. The Client then immediately left the crash scene in his vehicle. The police quickly stopped his vehicle. Once the crash investigation began the Officer noticed that the Client had indicators of impairment. Those indicators of impairment led the Officer to conduct a DUI investigation. Two sobriety exercises were conducted and the Officer stopped the exercises and arrested the Client. The Client then refused to submit to a breath sample. The Firm was hired to handle the case and, because of the nature of the case, the State wasn’t agreeing to dismiss the DUI based on the accident involved. The Firm had numerous conversations with the State that highlighted the fact that absent the hitting of the street sign there wasn’t enough information to show the Client was impaired. This fact, coupled with the facts that the Client refused to give a breath sample, and the Client had no prior history, convinced the State attorney to dismiss the DUI charge.
