The client was arrested for driving on a suspended license. Even though the client had previously been convicted for the same thing, The Ticket Clinic Attorneys were able to negotiate with the State Attorney and all criminal charges against the client were dropped without the client ever having to come to court.
The client was charged for the first time ever, when they were caught driving without a license. The Ticket Clinic Attorneys were able to negotiate with the State Attorney and all criminal charges against the client were dropped without the client ever having to come to court.
The client was charged for the first time ever, when they were pulled over and presented an out of State license to the police, while they still allegedly had a validly issued Florida License, even though the client had only one license in their possession. The Ticket Clinic Attorneys established to the State Attorney that this was an erroneous arrest and all charges were dropped without the client ever coming to court.
Our client was pulled over for driving 60 miles per hour in a 45 zone. The officer claimed to smell the odor of alcohol emitting from our client and requested that he perform field sobriety exercises. Our client had a difficult time performing the exercises but appeared extremely nervous due to the police officer's aggressive attitude. At trial, the lawyers at the firm exposed several lies told by the officer on the stand and the jury found our client not guilty.
The client was arrested for the first time ever, after they were caught by police driving a car to which the client had attached the tag for another vehicle. The Ticket Clinic Attorneys were able to negotiate with the State Attorney and all criminal charges against the client were dropped without the client ever having to come to court.
Our client was pulled over and arrested for possession of marijuana. Ticket Clinic attorneys determined that the police officers' search of our client's car was illegal. We prepared and filed a Motion to Suppress, challenging the stop/search. The case was set for a jury trial. The State read the motion, and dropped the charge. Ultimately, they agreed with our position, that the search was illegal.
The Client was Charged with DUI after he was stopped for speeding. Once the Client was stopped the Officer immediately noticed signs of impairment by alcohol. The Client performed poorly on the roadside exercises and was then arrested for DUI. Once at the jail the Client refused to provide a breath sample. In addition, at the time of the Client's arrest he was still on bond for another previous DUI he had received no more than two months prior. Because the Client had two open DUI counts the Court had revoked his bond on his first DUI, and the Client was stuck in jail. The Firm was able to get the Client out of jail on both DUI charges. However, the State was requesting a significant amount of additional jail to resolve both DUI charges. The Firm investigated both charges and discovered that while one DUI charge was an extremely poor case for the Client, the other case was actually quite good for the Client to take to trial. The State agreed and dismissed the Client's second DUI case and resolved the other to no jail.
The Client was charged with DUI after she was involved in a crash. The Client was immediately taken to the hospital where she got into several arguments with law enforcement and the nursing staff. The Officer smelled alcohol on the Client and noticed she seemed impaired. The Officer asked the Client for a legal blood sample, which she refused to give. However, the nursing staff then took a medical blood sample from the Client which showed she was more than three times over the legal limit. The Firm investigated the case and discovered that the Officer improperly requested the medical blood result from hospital staff. As a result, any evidence showing the Client's blood alcohol level was inadmissible. The State agreed and dismissed the DUI.
The Client was allegedly involved in an accident. Once on the scene law enforcement believed that he was impaired by alcohol and requested he perform sobriety exercises. The Client refused to perform said exercises and was then arrested for DUI. Once at the jail the Client refused to provide a breath sample. The Firm was retained and immediately began to investigate the case. The Firm discovered that there was very little, if any, evidence placing the Client behind the wheel of the vehicle. In addition, because the Client refused all sobriety exercises and the breath test, there was hardly any evidence regarding his impairment. The State agreed with the Firm's assessment of the case and dismissed the charges entirely.
Client was observed racing a Black VW R6 on the Florida turnpike. Both vehicles were traveling at a very high rate of speed according to the officer, attempting to outdistance the other. Our firm filed a motion because it took too long for the State to prosecute and the case was dismissed.
Our client was pulled over for driving erratically and driving at an extremely high speed through downtown Fort Lauderdale. When the officer approached our client, he observed an open bottle of beer in the car and the client admitted to drinking while driving. Shortly after, our client was asked to perform field sobriety exercises and to provide a breath sample. He refused to do either and was placed under arrest. The attorneys at the firm set the case for trial and our client was found not guilty by a jury after deliberating for less than 20 minutes.
The Client was arrested for a DUI after he was allegedly involved in a vehicle accident. Emergency medical personnel met with the Client in his vehicle and then he was taken to the ambulance to be treated. Law enforcement arrived on scene and noticed that the Client seemed to be impaired by alcohol. The Officer requested the Client perform field sobriety exercises, which the Client declined to do. The Client was then arrested for DUI where he refused to provide a breath sample. The Firm immediately determined that there was a problem with the arrest of the Defendant, as there was no law enforcement Officer that witnessed him driving the vehicle. In addition, there was an extreme lack of evidence in that the Client refused all tests by law enforcement. The State agreed and dismissed the DUI.
