DUI & Criminal Division

RECENT COURT VICTORIES

To protect our clients privacy, incomplete case numbers are provided.

Case Summary

Date: 11/03/2025
Case #: 2025-CT-******
Charge: DUI
DUI
Our client was stopped for a traffic stop.  After the officers had him step out of the car they stated they noted signs of impairment and asked him to perform Field Sobriety Exercises which he agreed to do.  After performing the Exercises the officers arrested him.  At the jail, he blew .000 and they requested a blood sample which the client refused to give. As soon as our attorneys received the case, they went to work on our client’s behalf. Based on what our attorneys were told by the client, the attorneys started negotiations with the State. The State offered the client Diversion to which he pled to a reckless driving after completing the conditions.

Case Summary

Date: 10/27/2025
Case #: 24*******8
Charge: DUI
DUI
Our client was involved in a crash with another vehicle. Witnesses indicated our client was the driver. When police arrived, they noted signs of impairment on our client to include bloodshot watery eyes and an odor of an alcoholic beverage coming from our client. Shortly thereafter, officers began a DUI investigation on our client. Our client asked officers if he was in trouble for DUI. Our client also apologized multiple times and indicated he was going through hard times. Officers later asked our client for a breath sample and he refused. After making both factual and legal arguments to the assigned prosecutor, the State dismissed the DUI with a Crash charge.

Case Summary

Date: 10/22/2025
Case #: 2025 CT 00XXX1
Charge: Unassigned Vehicle Tag
Traffic
Our Client was stopped for improperly using a transporter tag.  The Deputy ran the VIN through the computer system and learned that the vehicle had last been registered two years prior.  However, rather than charging our client with driving a motor vehicle with an expired registration, the Deputy charged our Client with driving an unregistered motor vehicle.  Because we knew the State could not prove the accusation, the case was set for a jury trial.  On the morning of trial, the State dropped the case outright.  Sometimes setting a case for trial is sufficient to cause the State to drop it.

Case Summary

Date: 10/20/2025
Case #: 25*******1
Charge: DUI
DUI
Our client - a professional driver - was involved in a crash. Officers arrived on scene and spoke with witnesses and with our client. Officers stated that they noticed our client displaying signs of impairment, including swaying, red, watery, and glossy eyes, slurred speech, and on odor of alcohol. Officers began a DUI investigation where our client admitted to having some drink and was arrested. He later provided a breath sample nearly twice the legal limit. Despite these facts, we were able to present significant mitigation on behalf of our client and get the DUI charge dismissed.

Case Summary

Date: 10/11/2025
Case #: 24ctxxxxx
Charge: DUI
DUI
Our client was charged with DUI Enhanced Blow above .15. The State Trooper was stopped by a concerned neighbor and told the Trooper that a Black Dodge Durango was driving erratically in the neighborhood. Allegedly the trooper saw a Black Durango take a turn and followed the vehicle where it came to rest in its driveway and our client stumbled out of the vehicle. Upon approaching our client the Trooper noticed many signs of impairment.  He asked  him where he was coming from and our client  said McDonald's. He was asked to perform Field Sobriety Exercises, which he performed poorly, was arrested and provided a breath sample of .272.
We demanded the dashcam videos and any witnesses indicated in the police report.
The videos were apparently not retained contrary to FHP's protocol, and a witness was not provided.
Result: On the eve of trial the prosecutor offered an amendment of the DUI to Reckless Driving.

Case Summary

Date: 10/01/2025
Case #: 2024CT00XXX6 
Charge: No Valid License
Traffic
Our client was arrested for driving without a Florida License. He showed his passport and Brazilian DL to the Officer. Despite this, he was still given a criminal charge. Our attorney filed a Motion to Dismiss as the State was unable to prove that the client was not in the country for more than 6 months. At the day of the hearing, the State dropped the charge.

Case Summary

Date: 10/01/2025
Case #: 25CT10XX0 
Charge: Racing
Traffic
Our client was cited for going over 100 miles per hour on the highway. Our attorney was able to negotiate taking a civil penalty for speeding in lieu of the criminal charge. Once the client was sentenced on his new civil penalty, the criminal case was dropped, saving and avoiding any jail time.

Case Summary

Date: 09/30/2025
Case #: 2025-CT-*****6
Charge: Felony Drug Possession
Drugs
Our client was a passenger in a vehicle that was stopped by Lake City Police Department for failure to wear a seat belt.   The vehicle was owned by our client but used and driven at the time of the stop by an employee.  The officers had a K-9 do a narcotics sniff of the vehicle.  A pill and residue were located in a cup in the back seat console of the vehicle.  Our client had no prior knowledge of the substance, however, was arrested for constructive possession of controlled substances. As soon as our attorneys received the case, they went to work on our client’s behalf. Based on what our attorneys were told by the client, the attorneys immediately emailed the State in reference to the case and insufficient evidence for the charges.  Our client even took a hair follicle test to provide to the State to show that he did not use controlled substances.  Once the State was able to confirm what our attorneys had been saying, and the State filed a No Information dismissing the charges.

Case Summary

Date: 09/18/2025
Case #: 2025-CT-******
Charge: DUI
DUI
Our client was stopped after an off-duty Indian River Deputy Sheriff called 911 in Brevard County to report an alleged recklessly driving semi-truck. Deputies responded to the scene where the vehicle was last seen and observed the semi-truck fail to maintain a lane and allegedly driving off of the road. Based on their interactions with our client, law enforcement believed she was under the influence of an unknown substance and attempted to conduct a DUI investigation. Our client refused to conduct Field Sobriety Exercises and was placed under arrest. At the police station, our client provided a urine sample for law enforcement to show them that she wasn’t under the influence of anything illegal. As soon as our attorneys received the case, they went to work on our client’s behalf. Based on what our attorneys were told by the client, the attorneys started negotiations with the State to inform them that our client has insomnia and was on medications for the same, which caused her to be tired while she was driving, not under the influence of anything. Once the urine results were returned to the State, it confirmed what our attorneys had been saying, and the State agreed to amend the charge from DUI to Careless Driving, a civil ticket, with no points or conviction assessed to our client’s license.

Case Summary

Date: 09/17/2025
Case #: 56-2025-CT-XXXX8
Charge: Leaving the Scene of an Accident
Traffic
Our client was charged with 3 counts of leaving the scene of an accident. We were able to prove he was not the driver involved and the officer got the information wrong. Once everything was sorted, the State dropped the case.

Case Summary

Date: 09/15/2025
Case #: 25-CT-*******
Charge: DUI
DUI
On May 9, 2025, Tampa PD was patrolling and came upon a recent car accident. Our client's vehicle has been hit by an Uber Eats driver, which caused minor damage.  Our client called the police for assistance. Even though our client called for help, the police blamed him for the accident. After noticing signs of impairment, a DUI investigation began and our client refused to participate.  No roadsides or breath test were done. This was all captured on video. Inside the vehicle were receipts from a local bar showing that drinks had been purchased recently.  Ticket Clinic lawyers took on the case. This was not the Defendant's first offense. Ticket Clinic lawyers filed a motion to suppress, in an attempt to exclude evidence.  Before the hearing, the state agreed to drop the DUI.

Case Summary

Date: 09/11/2025
Case #: 2025CTXX3
Charge: DUI
DUI
Officers came into contact with the Client who was stopped in the roadway sleeping at approximately 7:35 a.m..  The Client stated he had not drank since the day before.  He had injuries that prevented him from doing FSEs but he did the HGN, the officer was not certified to do HGN.  The client did not appear intoxicated at all on the video.   After retaining the largest DUI law firm in Florida, the Gainesville Office filed our notice or appearance and entered a plea for our client of not guilty. Shortly after filing we contacted the State and share our concerns that our client was cooperative and did not appear intoxicated on the video and that they had to prove that he was intoxicated at the time they came in contact with the client.  Additionally pointing out it was over 8 hours and they let people who are intoxicated out after 8 hours because they have sobered up.  Shortly there after a No Information was filed by the State.
1 2 3 4 5 6 179

Rolando A. Sanchez, Esq.

Originally from Miami , grew up in Central Florida.  After high school, he joined the U.S. Air Force where he worked on F-15E fighter jets as an Avionics Technician.  He was Honorably Discharged. Afterwards, he attended University of Central Florida and received a BSBA Finance Degree, cum laude.  Next, he attended Barry University for law school and among other things, served as V.P. of the Veterans Legal Society.  Since graduating in 2016, Mr. Sanchez has dedicated his career to helping those charged with criminal matters.  These cases include traffic, misdemeanors and felonies, including trials and post-conviction relief. Mr. Sanchez is the lead attorney in Ticket Clinic’s Kissimmee office, handling cases in Osceola, Polk, Hardee and Desoto Counties.