The Client was arrested for the first time ever for driving on a suspended license. The Ticket Clinic Attorneys were able to negotiate with the Office of the State Attorney, resulting in the State dropping all criminal charges, keeping the client’s record clean, and all without the client ever having to appear in court.
Client is a minor, charged as an adult for driving without a license. The Ticket Clinic Attorneys were able to negotiate with the Office of the State Attorney, resulting in the State dropping all criminal charges, keeping the client’s record clean, and all without the client ever having to appear in court.
The defendant was initially charged with a Felony Driving While License Suspended, facing up to 5 years in prison. The Firm researched the basis for the suspension and discovered that the defendant was designated as a habitual offender due to paying fines on certain traffic infractions. The Firm convinced the State to reduce the charge to a misdemeanor and was able to reopen the original traffic infractions. After presenting further arguments to the State, the case was ultimately dismissed.
Our client was arrested and charged with grand theft, obtaining property by false impersonation, and extortion in Columbia County. He was given a bond in excess of a $500,000.00. Our client was adamant that he was innocent of these charges and he hired The Ticket Clinic to prove his innocence. Using our relationships with the State Attorney's Office we were able to provide extensive mitigation that made it evident to the State that they could not prove this crime beyond a reasonable doubt. We were able to get all charges against our client dismissed. Case Closed!
Our client was involved in a parking lot traffic crash in the greater Orlando area. There were numerous people in a nearby bar / restaurant that witnessed the crash and alleged impairment. The officer asked our Client to perform roadside sobriety exercises – she refused and was arrested for DUI, second offense. The defendant was requested to submit to a breath test and a urine test. The client refused to submit to a breath test but did provide a urine sample. The Ticket Clinic attorney was able to capitalize on a few of the weaknesses in the case and filed a motion to suppress evidence. In speaking with the prosecutor before the motion to suppress was heard he agreed to drop theDUI charge.
A witness called 911 to report that our client was asleep, behind the wheel of a van, blocking the gated entrance to an apartment complex. The police responded to the scene and the officers ordered him to exit the vehicle – when he didn’t comply immediately they took him out of the vehicle and yanked him face first onto the ground. The officers then requested that the client perform roadside sobriety exercises – to which he refused. The officers arrested the client and charged him with DUI and resisting an officer without violence. The Ticket Clinic Attorney attempted unsuccessfully to negotiate with the prosecutor to get them to drop the case. The motion to suppress went forward and the judge found the detention was in violation of the Client’s 4th Amendment rights. Based upon the ruling from the judge the state was forced to drop both charges.
Client was arrested for a DUI and after they provided a breath sample of 0.000, the law enforcement officer requested that the client then provide a urine sample. The client allegedly refused to provide urine and as a result, their license was suspended for 12 months. The Ticket Clinic Attorneys were hired on the case and contested the suspension by the DHSMV at a formal review hearing and won, resulting in the suspension being invalidated.
The Client's vehicle was stopped for speeding. Officers then observed an odor of alcohol and slurred speech. Law enforcement then conducted a DUI investigation and ultimately decided to arrest the Client for DUI. Once at the jail he provided a breath sample that was more than double the legal limit. The Firm discovered that there were several mitigating factors relating to the Client's health that were extremely helpful to the Client's defense. The State agreed and dismissed the DUI charge.
The Client's vehicle was detained after law enforcement found him passed out in the middle of the street. The police began a DUI investigation and discovered that the Client seemed to be impaired and arrested the Client for DUI. Once at the jail the Client provided a breath sample that was twice the legal limit. The Firm began an investigation into the case and requested that the State allow the Client into the First Time Offender's program. The State initially agreed, then discovered that the Client had a prior arrest for DUI, which disqualified him from the program. But the Firm was able to convince the State to allow him to receive a reckless driving charge instead of a DUI based upon the fact that the Client had relied upon the State's initial offer and completed several of the required terms that are needed to be accepted into the program.
Client was pulled over for speeding and law enforcement smelled the odor of marijuana coming from their vehicle. Law enforcement searched the vehicle and located 11 grams of cannabis in two locations in the vehicle’s trunk, resulting in the client receiving two separate charges for possession of cannabis. The Ticket Clinic Attorneys were hired on the cases and all charges were dropped, without the client ever having to attend court.
The Client was charged with DUI after he was stopped for speeding and swerving all over the roadway. Once stopped law enforcement conducted sobriety exercises and determined the Client was impaired after he stumbled and had some issues listening to the officer's instructions. The Client was arrested and a breath sample was requested. The Client refused to comply with the breath sample request. The Firm spoke with the State on the issues and the State refused to completely dismiss the DUI case. The Firm took the case to trial and argued that the Defendant did not drink more than one drink the entire day and was not impaired, he just didn't do the exercises perfect, which was not a crime. The jury agreed and found the Defendant not guilty.
The Client's vehicle was stopped because it was swerving all over the roadway. Once stopped the officer noticed signs of impairment by alcohol and had the Client perform field sobriety exercises, which the Client did not do well on. The Client was then arrested and provided a breath sample nearly twice the legal limit. The Firm investigated the case and spoke to the State Attorney regarding the findings. The Firm illustrated that the stop of the Client was weak, and in addition the Client was cooperative and had no previous record of criminal history. The State agreed and the DUI charge was dismissed.
