The Client was found asleep at an intersection and the Officer observed signs of impairment. The Client would not do roadside exercises and refused to submit to a breath sample. The Firm investigated the case and discovered there was simply not enough evidence to convict the Client of DUI. The State looked into the matter and concluded the same. The State dismissed all charges in the case.
The Client was found asleep at an intersection and the Officer observed signs of impairment. The Client would not do roadside exercises and refused to submit to a breath sample. The Firm investigated the case and discovered there was simply not enough evidence to convict the Client of DUI. The State looked into the matter and concluded the same. The State dismissed all charges in the case.
The Client was stopped for failing to maintain a single lane. The Officer believed the Client was impaired and had him submit to sobriety exercises. The Client stated he had only had one glass of wine. The Officer then arrested the Client for DUI and took him to jail where he refused to give a breath sample. The Firm investigated the case, and while it was shown that the stop of the Client was proper, there was not very much evidence to show impairment considering the Client refused to give a breath sample. In addition, there was a language barrier for the Client which could have further complicated matters, mistaking confusion for impairment. The State agreed and dismissed the DUI.
Our client was pulled over by undercover officers who were conducting surveillance on a suspected drug dealer. After allegedly observing a hand-to-hand transaction, our client was found to be in possession of 100 Xanax pills. Our client was charged with possession with intent to deliver. He was facing a MANDATORY 2 year prison sentence. Ticket Clinic lawyers filed a motion with the court and presented evidence that was positive for our client's case. After hearing our motion, the Judge decided to sentence our client to only probation, avoiding the mandatory prison sentence.
Our client was stopped for driving too slowly by the Miramar Police Department. Officers claimed that our client smelled strongly of cologne and alleged that he was attempting to cover up the
smell of alcohol. The Miramar officers conducted a DUI investigation, arrested our client and requested that he provide a breath sample. Our client refused. Before trial, the prosecutors offered to reduce the charges but our client was confident in his innocence and demanded a trial. After two days of trial, the jury found him Not Guilty.
Law enforcement stopped the Client's vehicle as a result of the Client swerving within his own lane and hitting the solid white lane line. Once stopped the Officer observed signs of impairment by alcohol and had the Client submit to roadside exercises. The Client agreed but did poorly on said exercises. The Client was arrested for DUI and once at the jail submitted to a breath sample that was almost twice the legal limit. The Firm began looking into the case and found that the stop by law enforcement could be considered weak. In addition, the Client had no prior criminal history and was extremely cooperative with the Officers that stopped him. Based on these factors the State agreed to dismiss the DUI charge.
A stop was conducted on our client's vehicle for traveling 70 mph in a 50 mph zone. The Deputy observed an odor of alcoholic beverage coming from the driver and observed signs of impairment. A DUI investigator was called to the scene. The DUI Deputy requested the Defendant perform field sobriety exercises, which the Defendant agreed to do. During the exercises, multiple indicators of impairment were observed and the Defendant was arrested for DUI. The Defendant refused to submit to a breath test after being arrested. The Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles issued a 12 month suspension of the Defendant's license based on the refusal.
Results: The firm filed a formal review request with the DHSMV and after the review hearing, the 12 month suspension was set aside based on insufficient evidence to support the suspension.
Officers discovered the Client's vehicle sitting at a green light for a period of time that required other vehicles to go around him. Law enforcement made a traffic stop because the Client was obstructing traffic. As a result they discovered that the Client smelled of alcohol and they then observed marijuana in the car within plain view. The Officer asked the Client to submit to sobriety exercises, which he refused to do. After refusing to do said exercises, the Client was arrested and taken to jail where he refused to give a breath sample. The Firm argued to the State that they may have evidence of marijuana, but no real evidence of DUI. The State eventually agreed and dismissed the DUI charge completely. In addition, the State agreed not to convict the Client on the Marijuana count, which saved the Client's license.
Our client and her family, visiting Fort Lauderdale on vacation, were involved in an altercation at a local bar. Police claimed that our client struck a bartender in the head without provocation and then attempted to flee from police. The lawyers at the firm presented evidence that our client acted in defense of others after the bartender threw the first blows. The prosecution decided to dismiss the battery charges but continued to prosecute our client for resisting an officer. The lawyers at the firm proceeded to trial where our client was found Not Guilty.
Our client and her family, visiting Fort Lauderdale on vacation, were involved in an altercation at a local bar. Police claimed that our client struck a bartender in the head without provocation and then attempted to flee from police. The lawyers at the firm presented evidence that our client acted in defense of others after the bartender threw the first blows. The prosecution decided to dismiss the battery charges but continued to prosecute our client for resisting an officer. The lawyers at the firm proceeded to trial where our client was found Not Guilty.
The Client was found asleep in his vehicle while stopped at the intersection. Once the Officer began speaking with him he noticed that he seemed impaired by alcohol and noticed a bottle of vodka in the center cup holder. The Client admitted to drinking and also to taking some pain medication. The Officer had the Client perform field sobriety exercises and determined that the Client was DUI and arrested him. Once the Client was at the jail he refused to give a breath sample. The Firm investigated the case and determined that the Client had a long standing military career and had a mostly clean record with the exception of a prior DUI over 30 years ago. The Firm was able convince the State to dismiss the DUI charge as a result.
Our client was allegedly driving on Interstate 4 merging on to the 528 Expressway. While entering on to the 528 it was alleged that our client sideswiped another vehicle. The other driver called the police and reported to them that our client immediately fled after impact. When questioned by the Florida Highway Patrol, our client stated that both parties agreed there was no damage and didn't need to contact authorities. The Florida Highway Patrol cited our client for careless driving and a criminal charge of leaving the scene of an accident without providing information. After hiring The Ticket Clinic, our attorneys began reviewing the witness statements and found critical information about the witnesses and their likelihood not to appear for a trial. The Office of the State Attorney announced prepared for trial and the Defendant, along with his attorney from The Ticket Clinic also announced ready. After calling up a jury, the State realized the what our attorney knew the entire time, and after announcing prepared for trial, could not ask the Judge for a continuance. The State dismissed the criminal charge against our client and the Judge dismissed the traffic ticket for careless driving.
