The Client was involved in an accident. When police arrived on scene they did an accident investigation and determined the Client was the at fault driver. The police also believed the Client was impaired and had him submit to roadside sobriety exercises, which he did not perform well on. The Client was arrested and gave a breath sample of a .270, more than three times the legal limit. The Firm investigated the case and deposed the actual witnesses to the crash. The Firm discovered that the main witness that could identify the Client as the driver of the vehicle, was difficult to locate. As result the Firm filed a motion to strike said witness from the State's case, which would have been a significant loss to the State. Before the motion could be heard, the State agreed to dismiss the DUI charge.
The Client was charged with DUI after he was involved in a vehicle accident, performed poorly on roadside exercises, and subsequently gave a breath sample that was over twice the legal limit. The Firm investigated the case and discovered that the one of the State's witnesses, with respect to the driving pattern, was missing. In addition, the one witness the State had left could not identify the Client as the driver of the vehicle after the Firm deposed him. The State then agreed to dismiss the DUI charge.
The Client was involved in a crash. Once police arrived on scene witnesses pointed out that the Client was the driver of the vehicle that caused the crash. While the Client did not perform the exercises well, the Officer was extremely rude and mean spirited to the Client during the course of the investigation, to the point that it was detrimental to the State's case. This combined with the fact that the Client was elderly and still had a completely clean record allowed the Firm to convince the State to drop the DUI charges.
The Defendant’s daughter’s friend did not have a valid license and was stopped driving the defendant's car. After the Officer stopped the vehicle, he cited the defendant for permitting his daughter’s friend to drive the car. The Firm was able to convince the State Attorney that they could not prove that the Defendant knew that the daughter’s friend did not have a valid license. The State dropped the criminal charges against the defendant.
The Client was pulled over after running a red light directly in front of a police officer. During the stop the police officer recognized several indicators of impairment and requested that the client perform roadside sobriety exercises. During the stop a second officer arrived on scene and an ‘off the record’ conversation took place between the two officers. The officers initially decided to let the client go home, but then changed their mind a short time later. The client was arrested and charged with DUI (2nd DUI outside of 5 years) and with second or subsequent refusal to submit. After investigating the case and sitting down with the prosecutor the Assistant State Attorney assigned to the case elected to dismiss the charges.
The Client was pulled over for a minor traffic infraction. During the stop the officer recognized that the client’s driver’s license was expired. The officer mistakenly believed that having an expired driver’s license greater than four months was a criminal violation – this is not the case. The criminal charge should’ve never been brought. After pointing out the discrepancy to the prosecutor she dropped the charges.
Officers stopped our client after observing him driving without lights and with the rear bumper of his car dragging along the street. The officers claimed that they could smell the odor of alcohol on our client and conducted a DUI investigation. The client was arrested and charged with DUI after refusing to submit to a breath sample. The attorneys at the firm prepared the case and on the day of trial, the prosecutor agreed to drop all DUI related charges.
Our client was involved in an accident and allegedly left the scene without reporting the accident or exchanging information with the other driver. The driver of the other vehicle declined medical service and drove his own car home, but later claimed that he suffered serious injuries in the crash. As a result our client was charged with Felony Leaving the Scene of a Crash with Injuries. The attorneys at the firm investigated the case and convinced the prosecutors that the alleged injuries could not be proven. On the day of trial, the prosecutor agreed to drop all felony charges.
Client was stopped by law enforcement for speeding and running a red light while making a right hand turn. A DUI investigation ensued after the officer claimed he noticed signs of impairment. Subsequently the client then gave a breath sample over the legal limit. After speaking with the State Attorney about the specific facts of the case, as well as the clients lack of a criminal background the State agreed to dismiss the charge of DUI.
The Client was charged with violating his probation by not completing any of the conditions of his probation. The Firm was hired to help him and began by addressing his issues with probation and the Court. The Court agreed to give him time to complete many of the terms while getting rid of some of the other terms altogether. The Court then agreed to dismiss the violation of probation charge.
The Client was charged with DUI after being involved in an accident. When law enforcement arrived on the scene of the crash they observed indicators of impairment being exhibited by the Client and asked him to perform roadside sobriety exercises, which he performed poorly on. The Client was then arrested and refused to perform a breath test. The Firm investigated the case and discovered that the officers instructed the Client to state that he wasn't feeling any pain so he wouldn't have to be cleared by the hospital. In addition, the Client refused the breath test, but otherwise was cooperative, had no prior criminal history and his insurance took care of all the property damage. After the Firm had several conversations regarding these issues with the State, the State agreed to dismiss the DUI charges.
The client was stopped by law enforcement and the officer had the client conduct sobriety exercises, which the client completed. However the officer still arrested him for DUI and upon searching the clients vehicle discovered marijuana. The client did not admit to or know the marijuana was in the vehicle. After discussing the law on the issue as well as the clients background and the facts of the case, the State agreed to dismiss the DUI and the Possession of Marijuana charge.
