Our client was involved in a head-on collision with another car. The officers who arrived on scene indicated that they noticed that our client smelled of alcohol and trouble standing on his own. The officers requested a blood sample, and our client agreed. The sample showed an alcohol level of .16, double the legal limit. Our law office filed a motion to exclude the blood, as it was obtained illegally in our opinion. Once the motion was read, the prosecutor agreed with our motion and dropped the DUI charge.
The Defendant was stopped for driving a vehicle with an inoperative headlight. After the officer smelled a strong odor of marijuana coming from the car he requested a back up officer. The officer located a plastic baggie in the tray next to the drivers seat which contained marijuana. Additionally, the Officer found a glass pipe with burnt marijuana residue. The Defendant admitted everything was his. After the Firm entered into negotiations with the Office of the State Attorney, the State of Florida dismissed all criminal charges against the Defendant.
Our client was involved in an altercation at an airport. After arriving late to the gate and becoming irate, she was not allowed to board the plan. After being re-booked, she began demanding that the staff serve her drinks, and then she was asked to leave that flight. Ultimately, she was arrested and charged with Breach of the Peace. After lengthy discussions with the State Attorney's office, the charge was dropped. While her actions were annoying to others, they didn't amount to a breach of the peace.
Defendant was a passenger in a car that was stopped for a traffic violation. After the car was stopped, the defendant switched seats with the driver,and got into the driver's seat. The were still in the ignition and the car was running. The defendant was charged with DUI as he was in actual physical control of the vehicle. After his arrest, the defendant took a breath test which registered a .163 and a .169. Aquitted of DUI by a jury.
The defendant was stopped for doing 46 in a 40 mph zone. The officer approached the car and noticed the driver\'s speech was slurred, his eyes were watery, his face was flushed and he had an odor of alcohol on his breath. The officer asked how much the defendant had to drink and he said \"nothing.\" When asked why he smelled of alcohol, the defendant replied that he had been at a bar all night. He was asked to perform field sobriety exercises and he stated that the tests were biased and that he did not have good balance. He refused to take the exercises and then refused to provide a breath sample. In the middle of the trial, the State dismissed the case.
Police responded to a parking garage to investigate a hit and run traffic crash. When the officer's came into contact with our client, they claimed that his breath smelled of alcohol and that his eyes were bloodshot. Our client refused to perform field sobriety exercises and did not provide a breath sample, so he was arrested for DUI. The lawyers at the ticket clinic prepared the case and, on the day of trial, all DUI related charges were dropped.
Our client was stopped on I-595 for swerving between lanes without signalling. The police claimed to smell the odor of alcohol on his breath and had him perform field sobriety exercises. According to the police, our client performed poorly on the exercises and then refused to provide a breath sample, so he was arrested for DUI. The lawyers at The Ticket Clinic investigated the case and, on the day of trial, all DUI related charges were dropped.
The Client was issued a criminal citation for towing a trailer that was heavier than his license class allowed. As a Commercial Driver, this charge could devastate his career. Upon researching the case, the attorney determined someone other than the Client loaded the trailer heavier than was allowed; the Client simply was acting as the driver. The attorney convinced the prosecutor to drop all charges. CASE DISMISSED.
The Client crashed his car into a city sign because he was distracted while reaching for his cell phone. The responding police officer claimed the client must have been driving recklessly in order to produce $20,000 worth of damages. The client drives for a living so a Reckless Driving charge could cost him his job. The attorney set the case for trial. The prosecutor dismissed all charges a few days before trial.
Our client was pulled over for speeding over 100MPH on the highway. The police claimed that they smelled alcohol on his breath and asked him to perform several field sobriety exercises. Our client performed the exercises well but was arrested anyway. After being arrested, the client provided a breath sample under the legal limit. The State Attorney's Office brought DUI charges anyway. The lawyers from The Ticket Clinic prepared the case, and on the day of trial all DUI related charges were dropped.
The client was stopped by law enforcement because the Officer observed the defendant with his brake light on for over half a mile and then decided to make a traffic stop. After stopped the Officer made the determination that the Client was impaired and arrested him for DUI. After he was arrested, he was then transported to the Breath Alcohol Testing facility where a breath sample was requested. The Client then refused to provide said breath sample. The Firm investigated the case and immediately noticed that there was a problem with the way the Officer stopped the Client's vehicle, in that probable cause was lacking. The Firm discussed the issue with the Assistant State Attorney who proceeded to agree to dismiss the DUI charge.
According to witnesses, our client ran through a 4-way stop sign striking another vehicle and then leaving the scene of that accident. Witnesses obtained our clients tag and provided it to the police who went to our clients home and cited him. During pre-trial motion practice, prosecutors were able to secure a state charged continuance citing difficulties contacting their witnesses. During their second motion for continuance, citing an entirely different reason, Ticket Clinic attorneys were able to successfully lobby the Judge to deny the prosecutor's request because they had never corrected the problem cited in their first motion and were essentially seeking to perpetuate a fraud on the court. The prosecutor was eventually forced to dismiss the charge.
