The Defendant was charged with Racing on a Highway. The officer alleged that the Defendant was drag racing and accelerating in an occupied parking lot. The Defendant was facing an automatic one year license suspension should he have been found guilty of the crime. The Firm filed a Motion To Dismiss the criminal charges immediately citing case law in the 4th District Court of Appeal holding the Racing Statute unconstitutional. On the day of the hearing, the State agreed and dismissed the charge.
Defendant found in his car in a parking lot. According to the officer, the keys were in the ignition, the car was running and the defendant was throwing up outside the passenger side. After performing poorly on roadside sobriety exercises and admitting to drinking to much, the defendant was arrested. Defendant blew a .155 and a .174. Aquitted by a jury of DUI.
Our client was accused of violating his probation stemming from a DUI Manslaughter case. Warrants were issued for his arrest and he was alleged to have committed the new offense of Driving with a Suspended license. The client was facing a possible 4 year prison sentence for the violation. Investigation by the firm’s lawyers revealed that the Florida DMV had accidentally given the client a valid license. When they realized their mistake, the DMV suspended the client’s license without properly notifying him of the suspension. The lawyers filed a motion to dismiss the Violation of Probation Warrants, and at the motion hearing, the prosecutor agreed to dismiss the case.
Our client was involved in a single car accident where his front axle was torn from the car and the vehicle caught fire. The client, along with other witnesses contacted 911. When the police arrived on scene, they claimed that the client’s breath smelled of alcohol, that his eyes were bloodshot and glassy, and that his clothing was disheveled. The client performed roadside exercises and was arrested for DUI. Later, the client refused to submit to a breath test. Lawyers at the ticket clinic prepared the case, and on the day of trial, the State dropped all DUI related charges.
The defendant was pulled over for speeding. His license was suspended for refusing a breathalyzer when he was stopped for DUI 2 weeks prior. The Firm had been successful in assisting the defendant get a hardship license right after his DUI. Even though the defendant was not carrying the hardship permit with him the night he was stopped, the Firm convinced the State to drop both the Speeding violation and the Driving While License Ssuspended with Zero consequences for the defendant.
The Defendant was involved in a crash. When officers made contact with him, he was unable to indicate which direction he had been traveling in. He did not know where he was. The officer smelled alcohol on him, he had slurred speech, and he had trouble walking in a straight line. The Defendant told the officer that he had consumed an entire bottle of wine before driving. The officer asked him to do roadside exercises, but the Defendant refused. The officer placed him under arrest. The Defendant provided a breath sample of .185 and .188, over twice the legal limit. The attorney for the firm prepared the case for trial and the State dropped all DUI related charges.
According to the police, the Defendant was speeding and weaving in and out of his lane. Upon making contact with the Defendant, the officer noticed various signs of impairment, including odor of alcohol on his breath, bloodshot eyes and slurred speech. The Defendant admitted to having 3 or 4 drinks prior to driving. As he exited the vehicle, the Defendant almost fell over and had to use the car to maintain balance. The officer asked the Defendant to submit to 3 roadside exercises, and he agreed. The Defendant performed poorly on all 3 exercises. The officer placed the Defendant under arrest for DUI and requested a breath sample. The Defendant refused. The attorney investigated the case and prepared for trial. The State dropped all DUI related charges.
Our client was radared going 85 in a 45 mph zone and unable to maintain a single lane. According to the Police Report the officer smelled the odor of alcohol on our clients breath, he had bloodshot glassy eyes, and slurred speech. Also according to the police report, when the officer asked our client to get out of the vehicle so that he could serve the traffic tickets on him , the client stumbled upon exiting and swayed while standing. However the video and audio from the dash cam tell a different story. Our client performed the field sobriety exercises with only some minor mistakes, all easily explained by a knee injury our client preemptively told the officer would cause him problems. The video and audio on the dash cam showed our client to speak with no slur, and standing with no sway. Our firm reviewed all the States evidence and prepared for trial. After pointing out the serious inconsistencies with the officer's Police report and our clients actual performance on the video, and providing significant mitigation for our client the State dismissed the DUI charge the day of trial.
The Client was stopped for a non-working right brake light. As a result it was discovered that the Client's license was suspended for DUI. The State was offering 30 days in jail. The Firm discovered that the traffic stop of the Clients vehicle was unlawful and filed a motion stating the same. After consideration the State agreed to dismiss all charges.
According to police, the Defendant and a female passenger were passed out in a vehicle stopped in the right lane of the Turnpike. Upon making contact with him, the officer noticed the odor of alcohol on his breath. His eyes were bloodshot, and he was wearing a VIP wrist band from a nightclub. The officer asked if he would perform roadside exercises and he agreed. The Defendant performed poorly on all exercises. He was arrested for DUI and gave a breath sample of .095 and .103. The attorney for the firm prepared the case for trial and the State dropped the DUI charge against the Defendant.
According to police, they Fugitive Task Force was sent to pick up a fugitive who was on the run from an Attempted Murder charge. They arrived at the home of the Defendant, who was believed to be the mother of the fugitive’s girlfriend. There had been reports that the fugitive was hiding out at her home. The officers approached the Defendant’s home early in the morning. They had their guns drawn. The Defendant was outside smoking a cigarette. When she saw the police, she told them to leave unless they had a warrant. The officer claimed that the Defendant became belligerent, swung the door at him, and waved her cigarette in his face. The attorney for the firm investigated the case, and prepared for trial. On the day of trial, the State dropped all charges against the Defendant.
Our client was pulled over an alleged safety violation while driving a large truck pulling a heavy trailer. Our client possessed a commercial driver’s license (CDL) from the state of Georgia. The Florida Highway Patrolman believed the gross weight of the truck and trailer required a CDL class that he believed our client did not possess. The Trooper issued our client a criminal citation for driving outside of his classification. It was our belief and argument that the Trooper should never have written our client for this violation. Immediately upon receiving the case, our firm worked on determining the differences between our client’s Georgia CDL and the Florida requirement the Trooper charged him for not possessing. This information, coupled with information provided by our client’s supervisor regarding the actual combined gross weight of the truck and trailer led us to getting all criminal charges against our client dismissed.
