According to the police, they observed the Defendant driving at a high rate of speed. They caught up to him and observed the Defendant erratically drifting through lanes, almost striking the center median. The officer conducted a traffic stop. The Defendant was immediately aggressive and argumentative with the officer. The officer noticed signs that the Defendant may be impaired such as bloodshot eyes and the odor of alcohol coming from his breath. The officer asked the Defendant to perform roadside exercises, and the Defendant performed poorly on all of them. The officer arrested him, and the Defendant refused to perform a breath test. The attorney for the firm investigated the case, and concluded that the detention of the Defendant was unlawful. He filed a motion to suppress most of the evidence in the case. Rather than argue the motion, the State dropped the DUI case.
The Client was charged with DUI after making a left turn where it was not permitted. The officer also claimed that the Client ran a red light, but The Firm argued that this was when the officer was trying to pull the Client over and he essentially forced the Client through the red light. The client did fair on the roadside exercises, but gave a breath sample over the legal limit. After negotiations with the State Attorney the DUI charge was dismissed.
Law enforcement observed the Defendant drive from a green light at a high rate of speed while squealing his tires loudly through an intersection. No other traffic was reported. The Defendant was subsequently stopped and cited for “improper start” and charged with the criminal offense of “Driving on a Suspended License with Knowledge”. The attorney filed a motion to suppress the illegal stop of the Defendant's vehicle. After researching the case law thoroughly, the prosecutor dropped all criminal charges against the Defendant.
The Defendant was using his girlfriend as a driver for their business. While traveling together in separate vehicles, law enforcement stopped the girlfriend’s vehicle (registered to the Defendant) for an unrelated traffic offense. The Defendant and his girlfriend were charged with “Permitting unauthorized Driver to Drive” and “Driving while License Suspended with Knowledge” respectively. The attorney negotiated vigorously with the State Attorney’s Office and challenged the knowledge requirement of the alleged crime. Eventually the prosecutor relented and dropped all criminal charges against the Defendant.
Our client allegedly rear ended a car and that car hit a third car. As the first 2 vehicles were pulling off the roadway, our client allegedly sped off. A civilian witness was able to get the license plate and called the police. The police responded to the residence of the alleged hit and run driver and noticed a vehicle that fit the description given to them and the vehicle had fresh damage. The driver of the vehicle ultimately confessed to leaving the scene because he was scared that this accident could ruin his career. He was then charged with Leaving the Scene of an Accident. Our firm convinced the prosecutor to drop the charge based on our client’s perfect driving record, age, and career.
Client was seen colliding with another's vehicle, causing significant property damage, and then fleeing the scene. A detective witnessed said fleeing and attempted to stop the Client without immediate success. Finally the Client did stop and was charged with Leaving The Scene of Accident With Property Damage. After extensive negotiations with the State Attorney, all charges were dismissed.
According to the police, they came into contact with the Defendant and smelled the odor of cannabis. They eventually arrested the Defendant for Possession of a Controlled Substance. The attorney for the firm investigated the case, and was able to get the Defendant into a program for first time offenders. Upon completion of the program, the attorney for the firm was able to get the prosecutor to drop the case completely.
According to the police, they came into contact with the Defendant and smelled the odor of cannabis. They eventually arrested the Defendant for Possession of a Controlled Substance. The attorney for the firm investigated the case, and was able to get the Defendant into a program for first time offenders. Upon completion of the program, the attorney for the firm was able to get the prosecutor to drop the case completely.
Client was charged with DUI after sheriff's deputies found him in his vehicle, with the ignition on, after having just vomited outside his vehicle and parked behind a grocery store. The officers asked the Client where he was coming from and he would not give an answer. The client then admitted to drinking and gave a breath sample that was over the legal limit. The Firm investigated the case and discovered that the Defendant was actually attending a friends party in close proximity to the parking lot and found a witness to testify that the Client never actually drove his vehicle impaired and was simply "sleeping it off." The Firm then set the case for trial and the State agreed to drop the DUI charge.
Client was pulled over for driving on the wrong side of the road and speeding. When the officer approached, she thought our client may be impaired. She called for another officer to conduct a DUI investigation. That officer claimed our client had bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, was unsteady on his feet, and was not responding to questions appropriately. The officer conducted field sobriety exercises and form the opinion that our client was impaired and proceeded to arrest him. When asked to provide a breath sample, our client refused. Case went to trial and the Jury found our client NOT GUILTY
Law enforcement observed the Defendant driving a new sports car early Saturday morning on the Florida Turnpike. The officer alleged the Defendant was weaving in between traffic at speeds in excess of 100 mph. The Officer also alleged several vehicles were affected by the Defendant including one Fed-Ex truck that was nearly run off the road. After stopping the Defendant, the officer noticed an odor of alcohol and conducted a DUI investigation. Although the Defendant passed the field sobriety exercises, he was still charged with Reckless Driving and willful wanton disregard for people and property. The attorney challenged the validity and legal sufficiency of the officer's allegations. These challenges included the fact there was no video of the driving or radar/laser reading of the alleged speed. After vigorous negotiations the attorney convinced the state to drop all criminal charges against the defendant.
Client was pulled over after making a right turn, going across 3 lanes of travel and striking the median. When the officer approached the vehicle, he smelled a heavy odor of alcohol. He asked for our client’s driver’s license, and our client handed him a credit card. The officer also noticed bloodshot eyes and drooling. Based on these observations, the officer requested that he perform field sobriety exercises. After his performance, he was arrested and taken to jail. He refused to provide a breath sample. The State dropped the DUI a week before trial.
